Thursday, June 16, 2011

Images & Art


As the school year draws to a close, you might very well be finding more time to indulge your photographic hobby.

Erik Johansson's imagination
That will be a good thing for those of you hoping to gain school credit for completing the program. I will be marking your work over the summer and submitting results to your DE school.

But I might also be taking some time off now and then to enjoy the outdoors (and my own photographic pursuits!) So please do not be dismayed if I am a little slower with feedback.

To lighten your day and give you some fascinating images to contemplate, here are a few compositions by the bright young (25-year-old) Swedish photographer (and computer engineering graduate student), Erik Johansson.

Here is a very brief interview with Erik. Though it is a small interview, it has several of his images.

Re-defining "pre-visualization"


This, of course, brings up the old grumble about post-production. At the dawn of photography, George Bernard Shaw insisted that photographs should ONLY portray “reality” in the same way your eyes captured it.


It was said of Shaw’s photography that “He is as able a photographer as he is motorcar driver. Though considerably less dangerous.”

Digital captures become raw material
Of course many photographers discuss and value the technique of "pre-visualization," whereby you create in your own mind the image you wish to create with your camera.

If you are using only the camera as a tool, triggering the shutter is the final step in a process that involves a great deal of thought as you marshal exposure, depth of field, composition and the elements of design and style to create a fresh image.

Since the digital age, however, many artists have come to think of digital images as raw material for compositions that carry a message that goes beyond ordinary perceptions.

You can make up your own mind on that issue — but please enjoy Erik's work!


2 comments:

  1. Fascinating stuff! Kind of reminds me of the work of Robert Gonsalves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Linda and I are sitting chewing on the quote of Shaw's about photographs only seeing what our eyes can see.

    I think this is one of the great fascinations of photography - in that it gives us the ability to see a scene through other eyes. Wouldn't it be great to see as a hawk does - or to see the world as a bat would? Seeing things that we can't see with our naked eyes are most intriguing as it opens new worlds to us - making the blind see so to speak. So, while Mr. Shaw was an excellent word smith (and apparently a bad driver) I think his idea of limiting photography to such a small range of vision is near sighted.

    So - in response to another one of Mr. Shaw's quotes -
    "You see things; and you say, "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say, "Why not?"
    Why not let a camera show you things that you could only dream of? Why not?

    Linda & Norbert

    ReplyDelete